WEKO3
アイテム
Character Judgments, Criminal Responsibility, and the Role of Excuses
https://doi.org/10.15027/55799
https://doi.org/10.15027/55799cde8e108-2bc9-44c4-aa48-93ccfac0a5bf
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
HLJ_48-2_108.pdf (1.0 MB)
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2024-11-01 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Character Judgments, Criminal Responsibility, and the Role of Excuses | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
MOUSOURAKIS, George
× MOUSOURAKIS, George
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | 許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This essay examines the issue of criminal liability from the viewpoint of the character theory of responsibility, with particular attention being paid to the role of excuse-based defences. Two different versions of the character theory are examined and compared: the traditional character theory and the utilitarian motivational theory of responsibility. Following a brief overview of the distinction between justification and excuse in common law jurisprudence, the two versions of the character theory are discussed and their implications are highlighted. The essay concludes that the traditional character theory, with its emphasis on moral blameworthiness, offers a better basis for understanding the nature of criminal responsibility in relation to offences which also constitute moral wrongs. The utilitarian motivational theory, on the other hand, may be given priority when considering the question of responsibility in relation to offences in which the element of moral blame is absent, minimal or questionable. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学法学会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | THE SOCIETY OF LAW OF HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/55799 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 108 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 廣島法學 en : The Hiroshima Law Journal 巻 48, 号 2, p. 108-85, ページ数 24, 発行日 2024-10-31 |
|||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | 論説 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | Articles | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 旧ID | 55799 | |||||||||
