Item type |
デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1) |
公開日 |
2023-03-18 |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements by 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography, partial coherence interferometry biometry, Scheimpflug rotating camera imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy |
|
言語 |
en |
作成者 |
Nakakura, Shunsuke
Mori, Etsuko
Nagatomi, Nozomi
Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
|
アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
権利情報 |
|
|
権利情報 |
Copyright (c) 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS |
権利情報 |
|
|
権利情報 |
This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version. この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。 |
主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
NDC |
|
主題 |
490 |
内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述 |
PURPOSE: To evaluate the congruity of anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements using 4 devices. SETTING: Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji City, Japan. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: In 1 eye of 42 healthy participants, the ACD was measured by 3-dimensional corneal and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CAS-OCT), partial coherence interferometry (PCI), Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). The differences between the measurements were evaluated by 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc analysis. Agreement between the measurements was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. To evaluate the true ACD using PCI, the automatically calculated ACD minus the central corneal thickness measured by CAS-OCT was defined as PCI true. Two ACD measurements were also taken with CAS-OCT. RESULTS: The mean ACD was 3.72 mm G 0.23 (SD) (PCI), 3.18 G 0.23 mm (PCI true), 3.24 G 0.25 mm (Scheimpflug), 3.03G 0.25 mm (UBM), 3.14 G 0.24 mm (CAS-OCT auto), and 3.12 G 0.24 mm (CAS-OCT manual). A significant difference was observed between PCI biometry, Scheimpflug imaging, and UBM measurements and the other methods. Post hoc analysis showed no significant differences between PCI true and CAS-OCT auto or between the CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT manual. Strong correlations were observed between all measurements; however, Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement only between PCI true and Scheimpflug imaging and between CAS-OCT auto and CAS OCT manual. CONCLUSION: The ACD measurements obtained from PCI biometry, Scheimpflug imaging, CAS-OCT, and UBM were significantly different and not interchangeable except for PCI true and CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT manual. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. |
|
言語 |
en |
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
Elsevier Inc. |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
AO |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bcce |
関連情報 |
|
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.036 |
関連情報 |
|
|
|
識別子タイプ |
PMID |
|
|
関連識別子 |
22613688 |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
0886-3350 |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
NCID |
|
収録物識別子 |
AA10688328 |
開始ページ |
|
|
開始ページ |
1207 |
書誌情報 |
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
巻 38,
号 7,
p. 1207-1213,
発行日 2012-07
|
旧ID |
45956 |