ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 広島平和科学
  3. 43巻

Historical Development of Conscientious Objection and its system: An Analysis from the Perspective of Aporia

https://doi.org/10.15027/52219
https://doi.org/10.15027/52219
0da7319b-9b80-4a13-bde4-6f8976acda5b
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
hps_43_67.pdf hps_43_67.pdf (1.1 MB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル Historical Development of Conscientious Objection and its system: An Analysis from the Perspective of Aporia
言語 en
作成者 ICHIKAWA, Hiromi

× ICHIKAWA, Hiromi

en ICHIKAWA, Hiromi

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2021 広島大学平和センター
内容記述
内容記述 Conscientious objectors have been regarded as deviating from the image of a “true citizen", because they do not bear the obligation which the state required them to. But, by grasping military refusal from the perspective of aporia, it becomes clear that this perception is fundamentally wrong. A state should respect the inner freedom of individuals, then it cannot intervene in people’s conscience. Where religion or beliefs are concerned, an individual and a state can be seen as theoretically equal. Therefore, a state policy of conscription has inherently unavoidable serious aporia (dilemma/antinomy). There have been people who have tried to resolve aporia by refusing military service. Their behavior has contributed to the approval of the right of conscientious objection. At the same time, however, guarantee of this right means the internalization of conscientious objection within the conscription system. And it has also taken away opportunities to raise objection related to military service as aporias. Furthermore, nowadays the privatization of military is rapidly expanding. By being separated from the state in the form of a business contract, the state has succeeded in liberating itself from the aporia and obscuring its responsibility to protect its citizens. In the situation where it is said that “there is no aporia", it is necessary to have clear eye to find which aporia is ignored and hidden.
言語 en
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 This article is a translation of an article, Heiekikyohi no Aporia(The Aporias of Conscientious Objection), Kyojo Hougaku (Kyojo Journal of Law and Politics) , 16, 2019, pp.1-31.
出版者
出版者 広島大学平和センター
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/52219
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0386-3565
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 2434-9135
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00213938
開始ページ
開始ページ 67
書誌情報 広島平和科学
Hiroshima Peace Science

巻 43, p. 67-87, 発行日 2022-03
旧ID 52219
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-03 10:03:12.478267
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3