ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 広島平和科学
  3. 27巻

遺伝子組換え作物をめぐる生命特許と農民特権 (2) : シュマイザー事件」最高裁判決を受けて

https://doi.org/10.15027/15303
https://doi.org/10.15027/15303
e281c93e-b9fe-47aa-9f82-4a83f83382d3
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
hps_27_155.pdf hps_27_155.pdf (310.7 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 遺伝子組換え作物をめぐる生命特許と農民特権 (2) : シュマイザー事件」最高裁判決を受けて
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル GMO conflict between patent protection and farmers' privilege : A Schmeiser v. Monsanto Case (2)
言語 en
作成者 平木, 隆之

× 平木, 隆之

ja 平木, 隆之

en Hiraki, Takayuki

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 320
内容記述
内容記述 In the 1990s, genetically modified (GM) crops have rapidly gained cropping area and market share. As a result, GM crops contaminated non-GM traditional crops through pollination and other natural phenomena. In addition, the governments in the USA and Canada have concluded that GM crops can be patentable as long as they can be approved as inventions with novelty and usefulness. In the meanwhile, the “farmers' privilege" provided in the UPOV (The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants) conventions have traditionally granted farmers the right to save and replant the seeds obtained from their own property. The patent protection for GM seeds prohibits farmers from saving and replanting them without permission from the developer even if the GM crops voluntarily grow on the farmers' land. The main focus of this paper is on the protection of farmers' privilege from the ‘gene contamination' which causes the voluntary growth of GM seeds. This paper considers the fact that the patent protection for GM seeds developed by bio-multinationals has restricted farmers' privileges. It refers to the final decision by the Supreme Court of Canada for the lawsuit in which Monsanto Co. sued Mr. Schmeiser, a Canadian farmer, against his illegal utilization of the patented GM canola. In this decision, the Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Schmeiser infringed on the patent rights held by Monsanto. Nevertheless, it did not require Mr. Schmeiser to pay any compensation for his saving and replanting the voluntarily grown GM seeds for the sale of its harvest (canola) since he made no use of the ‘utility' of the GM seed, i.e., herbicide (Roundup) tolerance. The conclusion is that the spreading scope of patentability to plants will diminish the ‘public domain' of seed resources where farmers can freely save and replant them under the farmers' privilege. Hardin's ‘tragedy of commons' argues that the absence of property rights for common-pool resources will lead to their over-utilizati
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学平和科学研究センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/15303
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0386-3565
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00213938
開始ページ
開始ページ 155
書誌情報 広島平和科学
Hiroshima Peace Science

巻 27, p. 155-188, 発行日 2005
旧ID 15303
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-03 09:46:14.730029
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3