WEKO3
アイテム
アメリカにおける制定法解釈と解釈原則（2）
https://doi.org/10.15027/56185
https://doi.org/10.15027/56185d6efdf68-fa70-4f62-9204-e38e233b7988
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
HLJ_48-3_104.pdf (1.1 MB)
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2025-01-30 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | アメリカにおける制定法解釈と解釈原則（2） | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Statutory Interpretation and Canons of Construction in the United States (2) | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
福永, 実
× 福永, 実
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | 許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | This paper examines "canons of construction" in American jurisprudence. Canons of construction are presumptions that judges have traditionally used in interpreting the language of statutes and contracts. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the theory of statutory interpretation in American legal interpretation theory, thereby organizing the concepts needed to discuss the normative legitimacy of interpretation principles. Chapter 3 analyzes the justification of linguistic interpretation principles. There are two main justifications for linguistic interpretation principles: those that aim to reflect the will of the legislature and those that aim to realize the value of the rule of law. However, the latter viewpoint of the rule of law is difficult to justify from this viewpoint alone, since the principles of interpretation are not binding on precedent, and therefore theoretical standards for their application cannot be established, and as a result, the predictability of the principles of interpretation cannot be ensured. Therefore, in the end, many judges tend to seek the legitimacy of the principles of interpretation in the will of the legislature, which certainly has democratic legitimacy. The theoretical challenge of the principles of interpretation is thought to be in the method of control, but in the end, it cannot be denied that the basis for the principles of interpretation in the will of the legislature plays a large role in their theorization. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学法学会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | THE SOCIETY OF LAW OF HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/56185 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 104 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 廣島法學 en : The Hiroshima Law Journal 巻 48, 号 3, p. 104-77, 発行日 2025-01-27 |
|||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | 論説 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | Articles | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 旧ID | 56185 | |||||||||
