WEKO3
アイテム
Commentary on China’s Trial in Absentia: Purpose, Legitimacy, and Application
https://doi.org/10.15027/53724
https://doi.org/10.15027/53724d915cb18-ab3a-42e9-a22e-9c43d8971208
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
HLJ_46-4_178.pdf (1.4 MB)
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-04-13 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Commentary on China’s Trial in Absentia: Purpose, Legitimacy, and Application | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
郭, 晶
× 郭, 晶
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | 許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | trials in absentia | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | right to be present | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | rights to a fair trial | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | extradition | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | positive prevention | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述 | To provide an additional procedural device to pursue the corrupt officials who fled China and have been hiding abroad, the 2018 PRC Criminal Procedural Law (CPL) has introduced the trial in absentia procedure (TIA procedure). As a special mechanism that might infringe on the defendant's rights, China's TIA procedure has adopted the French model and designed sophisticated rules for the notice of the trial, the right to a lawyer, and the right to a retrial so that it could pass the legitimacy test following the principle of due process. However, this article argues that more significant crises of applying trials in absentia lie in the substantive aspects. Although China's TIA procedure can mostly meet the procedural requirements of a fair trial, TIA procedure in China might fail to achieve its legislative purposes. For instance, the accused who has been convicted in a trial without his presence might be a refusal ground to an extradition request, and the convictions in absentia might not be able to be enforced. In order to promote the interest of justice, it is recommended to adopt a purposive approach to interpret the rules of the TIA procedure, which leads the prosecutor to play a role as a filter to limit the prosecution in absentia. Only if the benefits of conducting a trial in absentia, such as pushing the fugitives to return to China, maintaining obedience to law and order, and providing comfort and relief to the victims, etc. outweigh the costs of conducting such a trial may the prosecutor file a prosecution with the absence of a suspect. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学法学会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | THE SOCIETY OF LAW OF HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/53724 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 178 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 廣島法學 en : The Hiroshima Law Journal 巻 46, 号 4, p. 178-144, ページ数 35, 発行日 2023-03-15 |
|||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | 論説 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | Articles | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 旧ID | 53724 | |||||||||
