ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 廣島法學
  3. 46巻3号

政治的ボイコットは表現の自由の保護を受けられるか : 近時のキャンセルカルチャーをめぐる議論を契機として

https://doi.org/10.15027/53543
https://doi.org/10.15027/53543
3bde43d4-478d-4c0e-9be5-b2bfd4084175
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
HLJ_46-3_58.pdf HLJ_46-3_58.pdf (1.1 MB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 政治的ボイコットは表現の自由の保護を受けられるか : 近時のキャンセルカルチャーをめぐる議論を契機として
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Are Political Boycotts Protected by Freedom of Expression?: Triggered by the recent discussion on cancel culture
言語 en
作成者 檜垣, 宏太

× 檜垣, 宏太

ja 檜垣, 宏太

en Higaki, Kota

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる
内容記述
内容記述 Recently, in Japan, in addition to criticizing and accusing individuals who have made discriminatory remarks and displayed other inappropriate behavior, there have been calls for disciplinary action, dismissal, and termination of contracts from the organization to which the individuals belong. “Cancel culture", which is an act that encourages boycotts of the works and businesses, is intensifying as a social problem. However, it is unclear how Japanese society perceives "cancel culture". It is necessary to analyze cancel culture not as a political or moral issue, but as a legal issue, especially a constitutional one. As a prerequisite for analyzing cancel culture and constructing a constitutional regulatory framework, I will examine whether political boycott, which is typical of expression accompanied by "pressure," is protected by freedom of expression. In addition, if political boycotts are protected by freedom of expression, the degree of protection will also be considered. In this study, this article will refer to the discussions in the United States. Among them, NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982) clearly argued that political boycotts accompanied by social pressure should be given protection for freedom of expression, and that the highest protection in the hierarchy of freedom of expression should be given. In accordance with U.S. Supreme Court's rulings, such acts with social pressure, as reading the names of boycott violators at rallies, writing about them in local newspapers, etc., are protected by the First Amendment as part of political boycotts. Also, in principle, even if some of the participants in the political boycott commit illegal acts, other participants will not be held legally responsible. The main reason why political boycotts accompanied by social pressure are given generous protection is possibly because society adopts democracy and guarantees freedom of expression. However, not only that, the empowerment of social minorities may be a motivating force as well. The above are important clues when considering whether or not cancel culture should be protected by freedom of expression, and if so, to what extent it should be protected.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学法学会
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/53543
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0386-5010
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN0021395X
開始ページ
開始ページ 58
書誌情報 廣島法學
The Hiroshima Law Journal

巻 46, 号 3, p. 58-32, 発行日 2023-01-20
見出し
大見出し 論説
言語 ja
見出し
大見出し Articles
言語 en
旧ID 53543
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-03 08:54:43.626458
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3