ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 広島大学文学部紀要
  3. 55巻

Mahābhāṣya ad P1.3.1研究(6)

https://doi.org/10.15027/25378
https://doi.org/10.15027/25378
038797fb-a03f-400f-bb70-77d0b422f760
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
HiroshimaUnivStudLitDep_55_22.pdf HiroshimaUnivStudLitDep_55_22.pdf (770.9 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル Mahābhāṣya ad P1.3.1研究(6)
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル A STUDY OF THE MAHĀBHĀṢYA AD P1. 3. 1 (6)
言語 en
作成者 小川, 英世

× 小川, 英世

ja 小川, 英世

en Ogawa, Hideyo

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 890
内容記述
内容記述 SYNOPSIS (6) 1.4.1.4. The proposed definition for the term dhātu: kriyāvacano dhātuḥ is applicable to a specific iteml ike √pac, which is known to be expressive of a particular action by virtue of the relation of concurrence (sāmānādhikaraṇya) between the meanings of √kṛ and √pac. 1.4.1.5. The objection is made in vt. 3 (kriyāvacana upasargapratyayapratṣedhaḥ): If the above mentioned definition is accepted, then one will have to deny the term dhātu to an item composed of a upasarga (preverb), dhātu, and pratyaya (affix) by rule. The reason is given in vt. 4 (saṃghātenārthagateḥ): The meaning is understood from their combination. The point is that on the fundamental premise that meaningfulness results only for what is independently used in common usage, it results only for the combination, which is used to convey a meaning; but for neither a prakrti (base) nor a pratyaya, which are not used independently. 1.4.1.6. The objection is raisedin vt. 5 (astibhavatividyatīnāṃ ca dhātutvam):An additional statement should be made that √as, √bhū, √vid are called dhātu, since they have no relation of concurrence to √kṛ. 1.4.1.7.1-2. The answer to vt. 3 is given in vt. 6 A, B (pratyayārthasyāvyatirekāt prakṛtyantarṣu / dhātoś cārthābhedāt pratyayantareṣu): it is established that both a prakṛti and a pratyaya are meaningful, and not their complex, because of non-difference (avyatireka) of the meaning of the pratyaya when there are different prakṛti-s; and because of the non-difference (abheda) of the root meaning when there are different affixes. 1.4.1.7.3.1. In vt. 61C (siddhan tv anvayavyatirekābhyām) is proposed the method of analyzing a given sound chain into its constituents and attributing given meanings to them, that is, reasoning from anvaya and vyatireka. 1.4.1.7.3.2. The objection is offered: There is no reason to assume that a certain meaning is proper to the prakṛti, another to the pratyaya, and the anvaya-vyatireka method does not work decisively in establishing the meaningfulness in cases where several items denote but one object andi ndividual items have different meanings. The answer to this objection is provided: Even if this were the case, one could not suppose that either a dhtttu or a pratyaya is the expressor of all the meanings ascribed to the dhātu and the pratyaya since they are not at all characterized by a 'generic term' (sāmātnyaśabda), which requires either an item denoting something specific or acontextin ordert od enote something specific. (To be continued.)
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学文学部
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/25378
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0437-5564
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00213701
開始ページ
開始ページ 22
書誌情報 広島大学文学部紀要
The Hiroshima University studies, Faculty of Letters

巻 55, p. 22-42, 発行日 1995-12-20
旧ID 25378
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-03 04:12:11.438000
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3