ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 広島外国語教育研究
  3. 12号

日本語とドイツ語におけるEメールの構造の違い : ドイツ語教育への示唆

https://doi.org/10.15027/30594
https://doi.org/10.15027/30594
24a56d8a-3d79-4fb1-82aa-e902a25dec15
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
h-gaikokugokenkyu_12_121.pdf h-gaikokugokenkyu_12_121.pdf (624.2 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 日本語とドイツ語におけるEメールの構造の違い : ドイツ語教育への示唆
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Composition of Email Requests : A Contrastive Analysis
言語 en
作成者 ハーティング, アクセル

× ハーティング, アクセル

ja ハーティング, アクセル

en Harting, Axel

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2009 広島大学外国語教育研究センター
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 370
内容記述
内容記述 The observation that email requests written by Japanese learners of German often fail to meet politeness requirements, prompted me to conduct research on German and Japanese writing styles. For this purpose, a database consisting of 200 request emails written by German and Japanese students was collected. To facilitate the comparability of the data and to allow control of situational variables, the emails were collected within an experimental framework. one hundred randomly-selected German and Japanese students respectively were asked to write an email based on a writing task aimed at eliciting a request frequently occurring in a university context. The results of the analysis of the request sequence have already been described in Harting (2008). The focus of this article is to look at how the requests are embedded in the email, i. e. which other text parts are employed to form an appropriate email request in the languages under investigation. Based on findings in text linguistics and contrastive pragmatics, the formal, structural, and linguistic properties of these emails were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively according to situational variables. The analysis aimed to uncover which individual text parts, such as the greeting, reasons for the request, the farewell statement, etc. are commonly used in the languages under investigation and how they are realised linguistically. Of particular interest was the performance of the request sequence. The results reveal structural differences in German and Japanese writing styles as well as differences regarding content and language use. While German emails structurally adhere strictly to writing styles of German letters, i.e. they contain a greeting, a farewell statement and the writer's name at the end, the text norms of Japanese emails are more flexible in this regard. At the content level, German writers make extensive use of expressions of gratitude and promises of forbearance in order to support their request, while Japanese writers prefer apologies for the imposition and repetitions of the request. As far as the language level is concerned, German writers express themselves more individually by using creative forms of expression and humour, while Japanese writers are more formal by making extensive use of routine formulae. The comparison of German and Japanese request emails forms the basis of a larger research project aimed at developing teaching materials that shall enable Japanese students to write German emails more appropriately. My future research will focus on the difficulties that Japanese learners of German have when writing requests in the target language and in which way they can be supported in this effort.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学外国語教育研究センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/30594
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1347-0892
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA11424332
開始ページ
開始ページ 121
書誌情報 広島外国語教育研究
Hiroshima Studies in Language and Language Education

号 12, p. 121-133, 発行日 2009-03-31
旧ID 30594
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-01 08:15:27.507878
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3