WEKO3
アイテム
非主張と疑似主張について : ダルモーッタラの視点から
https://doi.org/10.15027/50954
https://doi.org/10.15027/50954b294f78d-129c-4374-a02f-4e1307fda0c8
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Ann-ResProjCent-CompStudLogic_18_135.pdf (200.9 KB)
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-03-18 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 非主張と疑似主張について : ダルモーッタラの視点から | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Dharmottara on Invalid Theses and Pseudo-theses | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
繆, 寿楽
× 繆, 寿楽
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Dharmakīrti states in the Nyāyabindu that a valid thesis (pakṣa) is that which meets the following conditions: (1) it serves only as something to be proven (sādhya); (2) it is wished to be proven by a proponent himself; and (3) it does not go against facts that have been proved through certain accepted means (Nyāyabindu 3.38: svarūpeṇaiva svayam iṣṭo ’nirākrtaḥ pakṣa iti ||). Pseudo-theses (pakṣābhāsa) and the other four kinds of invalid theses (apakṣa) are not accepted as valid (Nyāyabindu 3.54). Moreover, the differences between pseudo-theses and these four kinds of invalid theses have not been fully investigated. The present paper aims to clarify these differences through an examination of Dharmottara’s discussions of these theses, which he develops in his Nyāyabinduṭīkā, a commentary on the Nyāyabindu. Close examination of his statements clarifies the following points: 1. If a thesis does not meet the condition (3) described above while meeting conditions (1) and (2), it is a pseudo-thesis. On the other hand, if a thesis does not meet either condition (1) or condition (2) while meeting condition (3), it is one of the four kinds of invalid theses. 2. The statement of inference consists of three elements: (1) a valid thesis; (2) a logical mark (liṅga); and (3) a corroborative example (drṣṭānta). It is only after inquiring into elements (2) and (3) that a thesis is determined to be one of the four kinds of invalid theses. On the other hand, a thesis is determined to be a pseudo-thesis at the very stage in which it is put forward; elements (2) and (3) play no role in this process. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター研究成果報告書（2020年度） | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 本研究はJSPS特別研究員奨励費20J20609の助成を受けたものである。 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/50954 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1880-6376 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12025285 | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 135 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
比較論理学研究 The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic 号 18, p. 135-144, 発行日 2021-03-25 |
|||||||||
| 旧ID | 50954 | |||||||||
| 備考 | [抄録]欄: システム上表示できない記号を一部省略。本文ファイルをご確認ください。 | |||||||||
