ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 地誌研年報
  3. 14号

ネパール・インド間の貿易の現状と課題 : ネパール側からの考察を中心に

https://hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2024647
https://hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2024647
ea0ea20e-1f3c-48fe-8239-096cdc343de6
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ANREG_14_69.pdf ANREG_14_69.pdf (847.5 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル ネパール・インド間の貿易の現状と課題 : ネパール側からの考察を中心に
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Issues of Nepal-India Trade : A Nepalese Perspective
言語 en
作成者 マハラジャン, ケシャブ・ラル

× マハラジャン, ケシャブ・ラル

ja マハラジャン, ケシャブ・ラル

en Maharjan, Keshav Lall

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 290
内容記述
内容記述 Nepal and India have a very unique relationship based on their common cultures, e.g., religion, ethnicity, language, and long history of cordial relationship. Even after the fixed border was demarcated between the two countries, the people, goods, money, and information flowed freely across the border in both directions. A long open border that could be crossed easily enhanced these flows. Additionally, because the people living near the border have economic, ethnic, community, familial, and educational relations across the border, for them these flows are just an essential part of their daily lives. Thus, they may not necessarily perceive the border and the flows across it as the governments of both the countries do. The governments, particularly that of Nepal, wanted to trap these flows as a source of revenue and thus needed to account them officially. Standardizing the flow of goods was a priority, and the two governments made a treaty on trade and transit in the early 1950s. Nepal has monitored and accounted for the cross-border trade to the best of its ability ever since the treaty, as not only did this trade constitute the majority of the country's foreign trade, the customs duties it generated constituted a vital part of the national revenue. For India, because this trade was only a negligible fraction of foreign trade, it was of little concern beyond the states bordering Nepal. Therefore, the goods traded over land across the border were accounted for only after 1964 in India. This difference illustrates the two countries' different perceptions of the treaty, trade, and evaluation of traded goods and levying of customs duties. Moreover, the trade is very lopsided in India's favor in the amount and the nature of the goods, as Nepal depends on imports from India to support and sustain its economy and the daily life of its people. However, Nepal exports only certain primary products and very few processed goods that India does not or cannot produce due to its own various constraints. Furthermore, exceptions
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学総合地誌研究資料センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0915-5449
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10199141
開始ページ
開始ページ 69
書誌情報 地誌研年報
Annual Report of Research Center for Regional Geography

号 14, p. 69-92, 発行日 2005-03
旧ID 16415
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-01 03:57:17.973394
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3