ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 大学論集
  3. 51集

戦後大学改革における外国語教育の「補助科目」化 : 大学基準協会内の言説に基づいて

https://doi.org/10.15027/47525
https://doi.org/10.15027/47525
22b1a209-a25c-4e3b-9ef3-3910096c2193
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
DaigakuRonshu_51_127.pdf DaigakuRonshu_51_127.pdf (1.1 MB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 戦後大学改革における外国語教育の「補助科目」化 : 大学基準協会内の言説に基づいて
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル How were Foreign Language Courses Excluded from General Education Curriculum in Post-war Reforms: A Study on the Transition of the Discourses inside JUAA
言語 en
作成者 樊, 怡舟

× 樊, 怡舟

ja 樊, 怡舟

en Fan, Yizhou

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2019 by Author
内容記述
内容記述 This study focuses on the sudden exclusion of foreign languages from the General Education curriculum that occurred in 1950, according to the wishes of the Japan University Assurance Association (JUAA). The study seeks to investigate the cause of this change, and clarify its background: a change in attitudes towards foreign language courses and the general education curriculum. For this purpose, a historical approach is applied to the discourses prevalent inside JUAA from 1947 to 1951. Analyzing who takes part in the discussion, the transition of discourses inside JUAA can be divided into three periods: the first, before Oct. of 1947, when there was still only the Committee for University standards inside JUAA; the second, from Oct. of 1947 to Feb. of 1948, when all matters about curricula were separately discussed by committees for each major subject; and the third, after Feb. of 1948, when the Committee for General Education was established and came to take charge of all discussions on General Education. Through this division, I find that there was a strong relationship between the results of a discussion and the objective of the discussion. Thus, the establishment of the Committee for General Education can begin to explain why Foreign Language courses were excluded so suddenly. Moreover, by analyzing the discourse of the Committee for General Education, it is obvious that foreign language courses were excluded in order to ensure the structure of general education curriculum be precisely balanced between “Nature Science," “Social Science," and “Humanity."
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学高等教育研究開発センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/47525
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0302-0142
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00136225
開始ページ
開始ページ 127
書誌情報 大学論集
Daigaku ronshu: Research in higher education

号 51, p. 127-142, 発行日 2019-03
見出し
大見出し 研究ノート
言語 ja
見出し
大見出し NOTES
言語 en
旧ID 47525
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-01 03:00:00.393005
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3