ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 大学論集
  3. 51集

日本における大学の意志決定と同僚制

https://doi.org/10.15027/47521
https://doi.org/10.15027/47521
dc8ffc7f-942d-4282-80b5-ec5075445ef4
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
DaigakuRonshu_51_65.pdf DaigakuRonshu_51_65.pdf (1.1 MB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 日本における大学の意志決定と同僚制
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Decision-making and Faculty Collegiality in Japanese Universities
言語 en
作成者 天野, 智水

× 天野, 智水

ja 天野, 智水

en Amano, Tomomi

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2019 by Author
内容記述
内容記述 A recent reform of Japanese university governance has aimed to clarify the authority of the faculty senate, indicating that the faculty senate can deliberate on only teaching and learning matters. However, such a trend should be considered from the perspective of its impact on faculty collegiality. Faulty collegiality encompasses both a governance system and a sense of community. Both considered to be imperative to organizational effectiveness. In this paper I propose to look at the relation the extent of the faculty senate’s authority and the level of faculty collegiality. Analysis of data gathered from faculty members in 23 universities showed the following results. First, to develop faculty collegiality as a governance system, the faculty senate should have the power to decide “academic matters," including choosing new faculty, making faculty promotion and tenure decisions, setting admission standards for undergraduate students, and approving new academic programs. On the other hand, there was no need that the faculty senate had the power to decide on issues related to “evaluation" and “budget." The former included evaluating teaching, research, etc., while the latter included determining budget priorities, selecting key administrators, and determining the overall teaching load of faculty. Second, there was no relationship between the power of the senate and faculty collegiality as a sense of community. The above results were the group level effect (between level effect). That means the effects mentioned above come from the organizational structure of each university. On the other hand, the individual effect (within level effect) was also considered in this paper.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学高等教育研究開発センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/47521
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0302-0142
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00136225
開始ページ
開始ページ 65
書誌情報 大学論集
Daigaku ronshu: Research in higher education

号 51, p. 65-78, 発行日 2019-03
見出し
大見出し 研究ノート
言語 ja
見出し
大見出し NOTES
言語 en
旧ID 47521
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-01 02:59:23.237249
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3