ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 大学論集
  3. 47集

学生エンゲージメントの一考察 : アメリカにおける学生エンゲージメント調査(NSSE)の発展 <研究ノート>

https://doi.org/10.15027/37319
https://doi.org/10.15027/37319
2b197147-92f3-4a9a-9734-771ae38034e8
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
DaigakuRonshu_47_169.pdf DaigakuRonshu_47_169.pdf (1.3 MB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 学生エンゲージメントの一考察 : アメリカにおける学生エンゲージメント調査(NSSE)の発展 <研究ノート>
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル A Study of Student Engagement : the Development of the National Survey of Student Engagement in the United States <Note>
言語 en
作成者 相原, 総一郎

× 相原, 総一郎

ja 相原, 総一郎

en Aihara, Soichiro

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2015 Author
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 370
内容記述
内容記述 This paper examines factors that formed the features of the concept of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in the United States (McCormick et al. 2013). Its research questions are: Why does the concept of student engagement in the NSSE is so emphasized the behavior and time spent by students on academic work? And why it so emphasizes improving the learning environments of college. Additionally examined are the NSSE indicators, which were newly-organized in 2014, and how they changed from the NSSE benchmarks.  In the 1990s, higher education in the United States faced two societal challenges. One was the necessity of developing the process indicators which could monitor the achievement of the National Education Goals, and another was the necessity of developing the metrics which could replace the college ranking issued by U.S. News & World Report.  Two preexisting student surveys, the Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) surveys and the College Students Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) were proposed to meet these challenges. Peter Ewell was in charge of the development of the new survey selected the CSEQ. Robert Pace who developed the CSEQ operationally defined his central concept of “quality of effort" by the number of behaviors and student time on task. These social challenges and the academic lineage of the student survey are factors which formed the features of the concept of student engagement of the NSSE in the United States. The NSSE was revised in 2013, and NSSE benchmarks were reorganized to NSSE indicators and High-Impact Practice. The first feature of NSSE indicators was to measure advanced thinking such as the indicators of Higher-Order Learning, Reflective & Integrative Learning, Learning Strategies, and Quantitative Reasoning. The second feature was the fact that the items of the psychological elements those were coexisting at the benchmark were reorganized as their own indicators such as the indicators of Quality of Interactions and Supportive Environment.  NSSE indicators extended the concept of student engagement to include the psychological elements such as the advanced thinking of student. And, they structured the behavioral elements and the psychological elements. Academically speaking, the NSSE indicators incorporate the thoughts of learning theory and teaching design to the concept of student engagement and construct the comprehensive concept of student engagement with the behavioral elements and the psychological elements which come from the student interaction and cognition.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学高等教育研究開発センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/37319
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0302-0142
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00136225
開始ページ
開始ページ 169
書誌情報 大学論集
Daigaku ronshu: Research in higher education

号 47, p. 169-184, 発行日 2015-03
旧ID 37319
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-01 02:47:01.618092
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3