ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 大学論集
  3. 45集

1970年代のアメリカ心理学会(APA)と女性研究者支援政策 <論考>

https://doi.org/10.15027/36537
https://doi.org/10.15027/36537
865298db-a6fe-4adc-90b0-d132728233c9
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
DaigakuRonshu_45_17.pdf DaigakuRonshu_45_17.pdf (537.6 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 1970年代のアメリカ心理学会(APA)と女性研究者支援政策 <論考>
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル The American Psychological Association and the Women’s Committee in the 1970’s <Article>
言語 en
作成者 坂本, 辰朗

× 坂本, 辰朗

ja 坂本, 辰朗

en Sakamoto, Tatsuro

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2014 Author
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 370
内容記述
内容記述 This paper is concerned with the historical development of the Task Force on the Status of Women in Psychology (hereinafter called the women’s committee) within the American Psychological Association (APA). It posits three research questions: (1) What occurred between the end of the 1960’s and the early 1970’s that caused the APA to establish the women’s committee? (2) What kind of persons and organizations were involved? (3) What were the requirements established by the first women’s committee regarding support of women researchers?   The first women’s committee in the APA was due to the efforts of the Association for Women in Psychology (AWP), which consists of a group of women psychologists without whom the APA’s support policy for women researchers would not have started.   The “resolutions and recommendations" advocated by the AWP included not only legal regulations of the federal government but also issues such as pregnancy, birth, and child rearing which were conventionally considered private issues. These issues had never been included in the field of support policy for women researchers. To some this suggests the women who organized the AWP were much more feminists than psychologists. (This statement is very controversial and would be disputed by western psychologists, especially female ones. It adds nothing to the abstract and should be deleted.)   When the women’s committee was created, the concern of the private field for the home was not shared with the APA, and it remained as a later task for the AWP. Another task for the AWP was how the minority status of women within the APA should be recognized. The reason for this is that the problems of discrimination during the early 1970’s were, first of all, based on class and race, and the viewpoint of discrimination against women was generally associated with them.   The principal primary sources used in this study are American Psychological Association Records (Library of Congress) and Association for Women in Psychology Records (Schlesinger Library, Harvard University).
言語 en
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 本稿は2012年度~2014年度科学研究費基盤研究(C)による研究「アメリカの学術学会における女性研究者支援政策の研究:女性会派から専門学会への展開(研究課題番号:24531024)」の成果の一部である。
出版者
出版者 広島大学高等教育研究開発センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/36537
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0302-0142
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00136225
開始ページ
開始ページ 17
書誌情報 大学論集
Daigaku ronshu: Research in higher education

号 45, p. 17-32, 発行日 2014-03
旧ID 36537
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-01 02:37:45.163634
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3