ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 大学論集
  3. 42集

ジョン・ヘンリ・ニューマンの『大学論』

https://doi.org/10.15027/31446
https://doi.org/10.15027/31446
33829311-1416-4a51-a165-03553f5dad3e
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
DaigakuRonshu_42_265.pdf DaigakuRonshu_42_265.pdf (1.1 MB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル ジョン・ヘンリ・ニューマンの『大学論』
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル On John Henry Newman's Ideas of a University
言語 en
作成者 吉永, 契一郎

× 吉永, 契一郎

ja 吉永, 契一郎

en Yoshinaga, Keiichiro

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2011 Author(s)
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 370
内容記述
内容記述 Japanese universities have been struggling to maintain a balance between research and teaching. Although it is now self-evident that scholars should do research, for some it is not easy to justify teaching except as a necessary evil for the sake of doing research. In this regard, it is worth examining the classics of university ideals in western countries that have examined the traditional confrontation between the two. In this paper, the author analyses one of the classics in this field, John Henry Newman's The Ideas of a University (1873) and discusses his arguments about university teaching, liberal arts, gentlemen, and theology. It is well-known that Oxford University and Cambridge University have a great tradition of colleges and tutorials. Unlike the German universities which transformed themselves into research institutions in the early nineteenth century, these British universities identified themselves as teaching institutions until the early twentieth century. It was in the middle of the nineteenth century when Newman wrote the book to defend classical education against the establishment of the University of London. According to Newman, the university is essentially an educational institution. It exists neither for research nor for vocational education, because these activities tend to narrow the human mind. Neither is the university's function to foster geniuses. Its role is to educate ordinary people and so enhance the general intellectual tone of society. Newman takes an essentialist approach to education, and considers that commercial and academic interests will distort the original mission of the university, which is to produce sound citizens and leaders for the sake of welfare of society. Therefore, Newman also rejects specialized academic concentration at undergraduate level, because it magnifies partial views and prevents students from grasping the whole. According to Newman, the whole lies in a broadly-based study of inter-related views. Newman rejects the modern approaches of learning and calls for a return to the ideals of the liberal arts in the middle ages, which emphasized, he asserts, leadership, virtue, and modesty, all of which were nurtured through mastery of classics and deference to authorities. Newman also rejects academic specialization on the ground that character building is more important than academic discovery. He regards the training of gentlemen as the mission of university education. According to him, scientific pursuit is not compatible with the ideals of gentlemen, which demand composure, balance, and compassion. No matter how beautiful and sophisticated are the ideals of gentlemen, Newman considers that they are secular and are insufficient for Christians. This is the reason why he claims that it is important for universities to have theology. He thinks that it is necessary for universities to integrate academic activities and existentialist concerns under the same moral reasoning. For this purpose, Christian doctrines should be disseminated not for the sake of inhibiting scientific inquiries but for the sake of achieving them thoroughly. Newman's concepts of learning, interactive teaching, connections between character building and learning, and self-discovery through learning have implications for today's university teaching. His criticism of excessive research also has relevance to the construction of the undergraduate curriculum. Furthermore, his emphasis on the moral interaction between tutors and students is also relevant, because university teaching is losing such a component, which leaves students morally isolated. Newman's genius lay in his ability to identify defects of modernism by adhering to the traditions of liberal arts and Catholicism. His calls for a Christian hegemony in the university, however, sounds anachronistic because of the prevailing secularism and multiculturalism, but it is arguable that, as George M. Marsden claims, the universities at least need to have space for religion and virtues.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学高等教育研究開発センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/31446
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0302-0142
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00136225
開始ページ
開始ページ 265
書誌情報 大学論集
Daigaku ronshu: Research in higher education

号 42, p. 265-278, 発行日 2011-03
旧ID 31446
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-01 02:24:28.948033
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3