Item type |
デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1) |
公開日 |
2023-03-18 |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
日韓の社会科教科書は同じ歴史的事象をどのように語っているのか : 高等学校社会系科目教科書における「日韓基本条約」記述の比較・分析を通して |
|
言語 |
ja |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
How do Japanese and Korean social studies textbooks describe the same historical event? A comparative analysis of the descriptions of the treaty on basic relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea in high school social studies textbooks |
|
言語 |
en |
作成者 |
金, 鍾成
宅島, 大尭
両角, 遼平
カン, ウォンジュン
オ, ヨンスン
|
アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
The treaty on basic relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea |
主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Textbook |
主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Discourse analysis |
主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Social studies |
主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Different narrative |
内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述 |
The history of Japan colonizing Korea for 35 years during WWII and how to remember the history has affected the relationship of the two countries over several decades. The different understanding of “the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea," which Japan argues that all compensations are done by the treaty and South Korea argues that individual right to request compensation is still valid, causes current conflicts between the countries. This article defines social studies textbooks as a consensual discourse of each country and compares and analyzes how both countries’ textbooks describe the same historical event. During discourse analysis on the contents of the treaty, the following codes emerged: “The Evaluation of Diplomacy," “Colonialization," “The Relationship with the U.S.," “Settlement," and “Postwar Compensation." In this article, we explain the codes with the representative excerpts and search for the characteristics of the individual country's discourse of the treaty based on the result of comparative analysis. By considering intertextuality, we also answer the reason for the different narratives presented by the countries. Finally, we discuss how we can improve the descriptions and possible future studies. |
|
言語 |
en |
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
広島大学大学院教育学研究科附属教育実践総合センター |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
jpn |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
departmental bulletin paper |
出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
ID登録 |
|
|
ID登録 |
10.15027/49112 |
|
ID登録タイプ |
JaLC |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
1341-111X |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
NCID |
|
収録物識別子 |
AN10491493 |
開始ページ |
|
|
開始ページ |
29 |
書誌情報 |
学校教育実践学研究
Hiroshima journal of school education
巻 26,
p. 29-36,
発行日 2020-03-20
|
見出し |
|
|
大見出し |
学習指導法・教材およびカリキュラム開発 |
|
言語 |
ja |
見出し |
|
|
大見出し |
Teaching Method, Teaching Material Development, and Curriculum Development |
|
言語 |
en |
旧ID |
49112 |