WEKO3
アイテム
Notes on the Historical Approach as a Methodology of Macroeconomics: A Critique to Contemporary Macroeconomics
https://doi.org/10.15027/48715
https://doi.org/10.15027/487159bbd6afa-e1a7-4ba8-bfec-2a7d762829e0
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
IDEC-DP2_09-3.pdf (486.0 KB)
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-03-18 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Notes on the Historical Approach as a Methodology of Macroeconomics: A Critique to Contemporary Macroeconomics | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 作成者 |
Ichihashi, Masaru
× Ichihashi, Masaru
|
|||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Macroeconomic Analysis | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Positive Economic Study | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Historical Analysis | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Evolutionary Theory | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Economic Developments | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | JEL: B22 | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | JEL: B41 | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | JEL: B52 | |||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | JEL: N01 | |||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||
| 内容記述 | This paper proposes a path for macroeconomic analysis as an alternative to orthodox analysis because the latter cannot successfully describe the reality of an economic society with the following essential features: 1) the structure of the macroeconomy is basically a system open to the outside; 2) variables within the system are frequently affected by factors outside the system; 3) variables are constantly being influenced by newly emerging factors; 4) the subject of analysis is an aggregate rather than individuals; 5) people usually behave by considering the situation and changing their initial plans; 6) interdependency and feedback form the basic structure; and 7) people do not always behave rationally, and they tend to have some bias in their cognition. If economic society presents all these inevitable features, historical analysis as an evolutionary perspective might be an alternative method for economists. | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学大学院国際協力研究科 | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/48715 | |||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||
| 開始ページ | 1 | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
IDEC DP2 Series IDEC DP2 Series 巻 9, 号 3, p. 1-23, 発行日 2020-03 |
|||||||
| 旧ID | 48715 | |||||||
