WEKO3
アイテム
野生動物の生命はどれほど重要か : 動物権利論の射程とその限界
https://doi.org/10.15027/55075
https://doi.org/10.15027/55075bf007b73-9fce-4723-8695-7c7e3dd6e13f
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2024-04-03 | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
タイトル | 野生動物の生命はどれほど重要か : 動物権利論の射程とその限界 | |||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
タイトル | How Important are The Lives of Wild Animals: The Range of Animal Rights Theory and Its Limitations | |||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
作成者 |
守邦, 惟
× 守邦, 惟
|
|||||||||
アクセス権 | ||||||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
内容記述 | ||||||||||
内容記述 | Conventional animal ethics, as represented by Peter Singer and Tom Regan, have argued for ethical concern for animals using criteria derived from specific capacities. However, some individuals find the implications of certain animal ethics troubling, particularly the arguments from marginal cases that could extend moral consideration to vulnerable human populations as well. Additionally, the substantial obligations these frameworks impose on our interactions with wild animals can be overwhelming or unrealistic. Wild animal suffering itself is an accepted fact, but the conclusion that we have the same obligations to wild animals as to domesticated animals is unacceptable. Therefore, I will explain the validity of a relationship-based animal ethic, referring to Claire Palmer's argument, as something that overcomes the competence-based animal ethics. This theory explains how the relationship between humans and animals makes a difference in human obligations. By incorporating this, we can rationally explain the differences in ethical considerations for wild and domestic animals and build an effective animal ethic. While acknowledging the merits of Palmer's theory, this paper identifies certain shortcomings and proposes a refined standard of duty that emphasizes a more specific relationship. | |||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||
出版者 | 西日本応用倫理学研究会 | |||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||
出版タイプ | ||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
ID登録 | ||||||||||
ID登録 | 10.15027/55075 | |||||||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
開始ページ | ||||||||||
開始ページ | 218 | |||||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : HABITUS en : HABITUS 巻 28, p. 218-245, ページ数 28, 発行日 2024-03-20 |
|||||||||
見出し | ||||||||||
大見出し | 研究論文 | |||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
見出し | ||||||||||
大見出し | 研究論文 | |||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
旧ID | 55075 |