| Item type |
デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) |
| 公開日 |
2023-03-18 |
| タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Management of intruded primary teeth after traumatic injuries |
|
言語 |
en |
| 作成者 |
Hirata, Ryoko
Kaihara, Yasutaka
Suzuki, Junji
Kozai, Katsuyuki
|
| アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| 権利情報 |
|
|
権利情報 |
Copyright (c) 2011 一般社団法人 日本小児歯科学会 |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Intrusion |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Management |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Primary teeth |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Traumatic injuries |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Treatment |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
NDC |
|
主題 |
490 |
| 内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述 |
Intrusions occur frequently in the primary dentition. It has been reported that conservative treatment of the intruded primary tooth is preferred if the apex is away from the permanent tooth germ. Conservative treatments include waiting for spontaneous re-eruption, and surgical re-positioning and fixation. Few papers have been published in Japan comparing the prognoses of intruded primary teeth between these two different modes of treatment. Therefore, optimal treatment for intruded primary teeth has been a topic of controversy among clinicians. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of intruded primary teeth between these two modes of treatment. Moreover, we examined the issue of treatment of choice for intruded primary teeth. The subjects consisted of 17 children referred to the Hiroshima University Hospital Department of Pediatric Dentistry for the treatment of 21 intruded primary teeth. Fourteen teeth were allowed to spontaneously re-erupt (group W), and 7 teeth were repositioned and fixed (group R). Antibiotic therapy and irrigation were performed in all intruded teeth. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using the following parameters: re-eruption, pathological pulp changes, increased mobility, discoloration, pulp canal obliteration, pathological root resorption, and disturbances of permanent teeth. In group W, root canal treatment or extraction were not performed since re-erupted teeth reveal no signs of infection. On the other hand, in group R, 57% of teeth required endodontic treatment or extracted due to signs of infection. The result showed treatment outcomes in group R were worse than those in group W. Our study indicates that most intruded primary teeth re-erupt with a favorable prognosis. Therefore, observation with irrigation and antibiotic therapy should be the treatment of first choice. |
|
言語 |
en |
| 出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
日本小児歯科学会 |
| 言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
| 資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
| 出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
識別子タイプ |
URI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
http://joi.jlc.jst.go.jp/JST.JSTAGE/pdj/21.94 |
| 収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
0917-2394 |
| 収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
NCID |
|
収録物識別子 |
AA10809637 |
| 開始ページ |
|
|
開始ページ |
94 |
| 書誌情報 |
Pediatric dental journal
Pediatric dental journal
巻 21,
号 2,
p. 94-100,
発行日 2011
|
| 旧ID |
32192 |
PediatrDentJ_21_94.pdf (81.2 KB)
