| Item type |
デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) |
| 公開日 |
2023-03-18 |
| タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Formulation of objective indices to quantify machine failure risk analysis for interruptions in radiotherapy |
|
言語 |
en |
| 作成者 |
Kawahara, Daisuke
Nakano, Hisashi
Saito, Akito
Ochi, Yusuke
Nagata, Yasushi
|
| アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| 権利情報 |
|
|
権利情報 |
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
biological dose calculation |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
downtime |
| 主題 |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
machine failure |
| 内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述 |
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of interruption in radiotherapy due to machine failure in patients and medical institutions using machine failure risk analysis (MFRA). Material and methods: The risk of machine failure during treatment is assigned to three scores (biological effect, B; occurrence, O; and cost of labor and repair parts, C) for each type of machine failure. The biological patient risk (BPR) and the economic institution risk (EIR) are calculated as the product of B and O (B×O) and C and O (C×O), respectively. The MFRA is performed in two linear accelerators (linacs). Result: The multileaf collimator (MLC) fault has the highest BPR and second highest EIR. In particular, TrueBeam has a higher BPR and EIR for MLC failures. The total EIR in TrueBeam was significantly higher than that in Clinac iX. The minor interlock had the second highest BPR, whereas a smaller EIR. Meanwhile, the EIR for the LaserGuard fault was the highest, and that for the monitor chamber fault was the second highest. These machine failures occurred in TrueBeam. The BPR and EIR should be evaluated for each linac. Further, the sensitivity of the BPR, it decreased with higher T1=2 and α/β values. No relative difference is observed in the BPR for each machine failure when T1=2 and α/β were varied. Conclusion: The risk faced by patients and institutions in machine failure may be reduced using MFRA. Advances in knowledge: For clinical radiotherapy, interruption can occur from unscheduled downtime with machine failures. Interruption causes sublethal damage repair. The current study evaluated the effect of interruption in radiotherapy owing to machine failure on patients and medical institutions using a new method, that is, machine failure risk analysis. |
|
言語 |
en |
| 出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| 出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
Wiley |
| 言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
| 資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
| 出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
10.1002/acm2.13126 |
| 関連情報 |
|
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13126 |
| 収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
1526-9914 |
| 開始ページ |
|
|
開始ページ |
165 |
| 書誌情報 |
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
巻 22,
号 1,
p. 165-173,
発行日 2021-02-03
|
| 旧ID |
50437 |
JApplClinMedPhys_22_165.pdf (299.6 KB)
