WEKO3
アイテム
詩論家ジャヤラタの《疑似的再言》論
https://doi.org/10.15027/0002040763
https://doi.org/10.15027/0002040763c30cd4e5-24ca-4181-960c-88712dd60381
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Ann-ResProjCent-CompStudLogic_22_185.pdf (461 KB)
|
|
| Item type | デフォルト(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2025-06-27 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 詩論家ジャヤラタの《疑似的再言》論 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Jayaratha’s Discourse on “pseudo-repetition” (punaruktavadābhāsa) | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
柴, 優人
× 柴, 優人
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | In medieval Kashmiri poetics, the debate on “pseudo-repetition” (punaruktavadābhāsa) arose from a disagreement between Mammaṭa (11th century) and Ruyyaka (12th century) regarding the classification methods of poetic ornaments (alaṃkāra). Mammaṭa considered “pseudo-repetition” to be an ornament of both sound and meaning (ubhayālaṃkāra), claiming that its poetic impact is realized only when the roles of sound and meaning are distinctly determined. In contrast, Ruyyaka viewed this ornament as an ornament of meaning (arthālaṃkāra), emphasizing the support-supported relationship (āśrayāśrayibhāva). Ruyyaka’s classification was criticized by Śobhākaramitra (12th century), who in turn was challenged by Jayaratha (13th century). Jayaratha conducted a thorough analysis of how the repetition of meaning correlates with the aesthetic quality of poetic ornaments. He argued that the core meaning is embedded within the verse itself, while the repeated meaning serves as a literal interpretation (vācyārtha) of the verse, with the poet’s intention (kavivivakṣā) providing a basis for its recognition. In the final stage of the discussion on “pseudo-repetition,” Jayaratha concluded that poetic ornaments should be classified based on their direct foundational support. He contended that Mammaṭa’s theory, grounded in positive-negative concomitance (anvayavyatireka), makes it difficult to maintain the traditional classification system of poetic ornaments. |
|||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター研究成果報告書（2024年度） | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic (2024) | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic, Hiroshima University | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/0002040763 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1880-6376 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 比較論理学研究 en : The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic 号 22, p. 185-206, ページ数 22, 発行日 2025-03-25 |
|||||||||
