WEKO3
アイテム
別異のオントロジー : 多元論と一元論の相克
https://doi.org/10.15027/0002040420
https://doi.org/10.15027/000204042007ea0c42-a0e8-40d3-8d5f-8d98a1def2fd
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Ann-ResProjCent-CompStudLogic_23_97.pdf (366 KB)
|
|
| Item type | デフォルト(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2025-04-25 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 別異のオントロジー : 多元論と一元論の相克 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | The Ontology of the Difference (bheda): A Conflict between Pluralism and Monism | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
藤井, 隆道
× 藤井, 隆道
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Although both Mīmāṃsā and Vedānta engage in the exegetical investigation of the Vedic scripture, they developed contrasting perspectives on the ontological nature of reality. Mīmāṃsā supports ontological pluralism that is suitable for ritual contexts, whereas Vedānta, especially the Advaita tradition, develops a monistic worldview grounded in transcendental principles, such as Ātman and Brahman. In this paper, I aim to elucidate an aspect of the conflict between pluralism and monism in the history of Indian philosophy, focusing on concepts such as nonexistence (abhāva) and difference (bheda), with reference to the discussions of Kumārilabhaṭṭa and Maṇḍanamiśra. In the Pratyakṣapariccheda chapter of the Ślokavārttika (ŚV), Kumārila criticizes the monistic view and presents the idea that every object possesses both universal (sāmānya, common property) and particular (viśeṣa, differentiating property) as its nature. In the Ākṛtivāda chapter of the ŚV, he further explores this dual nature of reality in greater detail, arguing that reality has a ‘variegated’ (citra) nature, consisting of both common and differentiating properties in relation to others. These arguments illustrate his pluralistic view that objects are distinct from one another by their very nature. In the Abhāvapariccheda chapter of the ŚV, Kumārila asserts that every entity is existent by its own nature and is nonexistent by the nature of others. Each thing has a mutual nonexistence (anyonya-abhāva) in relation to things of different kinds, which prevents them from mixing with one another. Maṇḍanamiśra criticizes Kumārila’s arguments outlined above in the so-called ‘Tarkakāṇḍa’ section of the Brahmasiddhi. First, while he argues that perception has only positive functions and no negative functions, he refutes the validity of abhāva-pramāṇa as asserted by Kumārila. Furthermore, in the latter part of the Tarkakāṇḍa, Maṇḍana inquires which of the two types of knowledge—knowledge of difference (bheda) and knowledge of non-difference (abheda), both of which are experienced in everyday life — is correct. In answering this question, he criticizes Kumārila ’s notion, such as the variegated nature of reality and the mutual nonexistence (anyonya-abhāva) of things. In this section of Brahmasiddhi, Maṇḍana attempts to demonstrate logically that the monistic teachings of the scriptures remain unshaken by the apparent diversity of the phenomenal world. |
|||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター研究成果報告書（2024年度） | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic (2024) | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic,Hiroshima University | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/0002040420 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 助成情報 | ||||||||||
| 助成機関識別子タイプ | Crossref Funder | |||||||||
| 助成機関識別子タイプURI | https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001691 | |||||||||
| 助成機関名 | 日本学術振興会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 助成機関名 | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 研究課題番号URI | https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-23K20420/ | |||||||||
| 研究課題番号 | 21H00472 | |||||||||
| 研究課題名 | インド哲学における「無」の思想 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 研究課題名 | The concept of absence and negation in Indian philosophy | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 助成情報 | ||||||||||
| 助成機関識別子タイプ | Crossref Funder | |||||||||
| 助成機関識別子タイプURI | https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001691 | |||||||||
| 助成機関名 | 日本学術振興会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 助成機関名 | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 研究課題番号URI | https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-23K20420/ | |||||||||
| 研究課題番号 | 23K20420 | |||||||||
| 研究課題名 | インド哲学における「無」の思想 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 研究課題名 | The concept of absence and negation in Indian philosophy | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1880-6376 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 比較論理学研究 en : The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic 号 23(特別号), p. 97-115, ページ数 19, 発行日 2025-03-25 |
|||||||||
