WEKO3
アイテム
ガンゲーシャの非存在知覚論とウダヤナ
https://doi.org/10.15027/0002040419
https://doi.org/10.15027/0002040419af4c06fd-c363-4d97-9d86-8fcbdb886e91
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Ann-ResProjCent-CompStudLogic_23_75.pdf (453 KB)
|
|
| Item type | デフォルト(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2025-04-25 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | ガンゲーシャの非存在知覚論とウダヤナ | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Gaṅgeśa and Udayana on Past Absence (prāṅnāstitā) | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
和田, 壽弘
× 和田, 壽弘
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The starting point of the Navya-nyāya method of analysis is found in Udayana (ca. 11th cent.), and the method is established by Gaṅgeśa (ca. 14th cent.). This paper aims to illustrate how Gaṅgeśa was influenced by Udayana in a particular context, such as the discussion of the cognition of past absence. This absence is not that which was cognized in the past, but that which is later affirmed in retrospect. For this task, I have dealt with Gaṅgeśa’s Tattvacintāmaṇi, the “Non-perception Chapter” (Anupalabdhivāda) and Udayana’s Nyāyavārttikatātparyapariśuddhi (NVTP) on Nyāyasūtra 1.1.4. Gaṅgeśa presents the view of the Bhaṭṭa school of Mīmāṃsā regarding how to cognize absence in general in the preceding large objection section (pūrvapakṣa) of the chapter. According to this school, the cognition of absence is acquired through the sixth means of acquiring cognition (pramāṇa), i.e. non-perception (anupalabdhi), while according to the Nyāya school, it is acquired through sense organs. In the beginning of the latter half of his final view (uttarapakṣa), in order to corroborate its view of non-perception, the Bhaṭṭa school illustrates a case in which no sense organ can function as grasping a past absence. Gaṅgeśa devotes the remaining half to the discussion of how to grasp the past absence in the above case and concludes that such an absence is cognized by means of inference, and not by non-perception. Gaṅgeśa’s argumentation primarily follows Udayana’s. I have shown six similar points of argumentation between them; surprisingly, each point appears in the same order in their two texts. On the other hand, I have presented three points which Udayana does not argue. The first and second points of those three are not necessarily Gaṅgeśa’s amazing improvements over Udayana’s claim. The third point may represent his talent to surpass Udayana; he provides an improvement of the syllogism (prayoga) over Udayana’s which is stated in his Kiraṇāvalī but not in the NVTP to establish that the cognition of that past absence is acquired through inference. To sum up, Gaṅgeśa’s contribution consists of two respects: more intelligible interpretation of Udayana’s argument and his improved syllogism. This proves that Udayana’s NVTP as well as his Nyāyakumāñjali exerts considerable influences on Gaṅgeśa in contexts. His Kiraṇāvalī is also helpful in investigating his influence on Gaṅgeśa. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター研究成果報告書（2024年度） | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic (2024) | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic,Hiroshima University | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/0002040419 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 助成情報 | ||||||||||
| 助成機関識別子タイプ | Crossref Funder | |||||||||
| 助成機関識別子タイプURI | https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001691 | |||||||||
| 助成機関名 | 日本学術振興会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 助成機関名 | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 研究課題番号URI | https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-23K20420/ | |||||||||
| 研究課題番号 | 21H00472 | |||||||||
| 研究課題名 | インド哲学における「無」の思想 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 研究課題名 | The concept of absence and negation in Indian philosophy | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 助成情報 | ||||||||||
| 助成機関識別子タイプ | Crossref Funder | |||||||||
| 助成機関識別子タイプURI | https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001691 | |||||||||
| 助成機関名 | 日本学術振興会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 助成機関名 | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 研究課題番号URI | https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-23K20420/ | |||||||||
| 研究課題番号 | 23K20420 | |||||||||
| 研究課題名 | インド哲学における「無」の思想 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 研究課題名 | The concept of absence and negation in Indian philosophy | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1880-6376 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 比較論理学研究 en : The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic 号 23(特別号), p. 75-95, ページ数 21, 発行日 2025-03-25 |
|||||||||
