ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 広島平和科学
  3. 35巻

「ひろしまレポート」ランキング化試論 : 地球平和指数ランキングとの比較を交えて

https://doi.org/10.15027/38046
https://doi.org/10.15027/38046
67b3c47f-4320-4ed5-b105-575a4136372b
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
hps_35_19.pdf hps_35_19.pdf (459.5 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 「ひろしまレポート」ランキング化試論 : 地球平和指数ランキングとの比較を交えて
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル A Study of ranking countries based on the Hiroshima Report by comparison with the Global Peace Index
言語 en
作成者 三上, 貴教

× 三上, 貴教

ja 三上, 貴教

en Mikami, Takanori

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2013 広島大学平和科学研究センター
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 319
内容記述
内容記述 Since August 6, 1945, Hiroshima's mission has been to educate the world about the cruelty and disaster caused by the use of atomic weapons. Hiroshima has been so successful in their mission that, after almost 70 years since the destruction, atomic weapons have never been used during war. As Nobel laureate and economist, Thomas Schelling, pointed out in his acceptance speech, Hiroshima's legacy has prevented atomic weapons from being used in the world.   Regardless of Hiroshima's legacy, the development of information technology and the resulting access to information have made it easier for anybody to learn how to make nuclear weapons and, consequently, erode our ability to avoid catastrophe. The Hiroshima Report, in which 19 countries' performances on nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and nuclear security are evaluated based on the objective data, would have a potential to play a role in promoting efforts toward a world without nuclear weapons. However, the Report needs to do more work, and I would propose a ranking of countries evaluated.   According to the Hiroshima Report, evaluation of the three areas (i.e. nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and nuclear security) for the three groups of countries (i.e. nuclear-weapon states, non-NPT parties, and non-nuclear-weapon states) was made separately because of their different characteristics as well as different set of criteria. However, such a way of evaluation could make it less clear to identify which country can be evaluated positively and vice-versa, and then weakens the impact of the Report. My recommendation for the upcoming Hiroshima Report is to integrate three areas as well as three groups, and to rank countries evaluated under the headlines of decreasing the threat of nuclear weapons.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学平和科学研究センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/38046
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0386-3565
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00213938
開始ページ
開始ページ 19
書誌情報 広島平和科学
Hiroshima Peace Science

巻 35, p. 19-42, 発行日 2013
旧ID 38046
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-03 09:54:00.969442
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3