{"created":"2025-03-03T09:05:40.190753+00:00","id":2035854,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"de6a0b7f-f602-4727-af71-c6307d87dff1"},"_deposit":{"created_by":41,"id":"2035854","owner":"41","owners":[41],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2035854"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp:02035854","sets":["1727147343679:1730444742891:1739272050430"]},"author_link":[],"control_number":"2035854","item_1617186331708":{"attribute_name":"Title","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"三者契約により銀行が有する所有権留保の買主倒産時の効力に関する2つのドイツ判例 : 求償権及び原債権並びに合意による権利構築の関係解明のために（１）","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Zwei BGH-Urteile zur Wirksamkeit von bankgehaltenen Eigentumsvorbehalt im Falle der Insolvenz des Käufers(1)","subitem_title_language":"de"}]},"item_1617186419668":{"attribute_name":"Creator","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"田村, 耕一","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"TAMURA, Koichi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"familyNames":[{"familyName":"田村","familyNameLang":"ja"},{"familyName":"TAMURA","familyNameLang":"en"}],"givenNames":[{"givenName":"耕一","givenNameLang":"ja"},{"givenName":"Koichi","givenNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1617186476635":{"attribute_name":"Access Rights","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_1617186499011":{"attribute_name":"Rights","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_1617186626617":{"attribute_name":"Description","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Diese Arbeit stellt <BGH, Urteil vom 27. 3. 2008 - IX ZR 220/05> und <BGH, Urteil vom 8. 5. 2014 – IX ZR 128/12> in Japan vor und untersucht die Wirksamkeit von Eigentumsvorbehalten, die von Dritten erworben wurden.  1. <BGH, Urteil vom 27. 3. 2008 - IX ZR 220/05> entschied, dass in einemVertrag, bei dem der Käufer ein Darlehen von der Bank erhält und der Verkäufer die Kaufpreisforderung und das vorbehaltene Eigentum an die Bank abtritt, das Eigentumsvorbehalt aufgrund seiner Definition und seines Zwecks, ähnlich wie bei einer Sicherungsübereignung, eine Bedeutungswandel erfährt. Daher kann die Bank die Kaufpreisforderung und das Eigentumsvorbehalt nicht allein aüsuben.","subitem_description_language":"de","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_1617186643794":{"attribute_name":"Publisher","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"広島大学法学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"},{"subitem_publisher":"THE SOCIETY OF LAW OF HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY","subitem_publisher_language":"en"}]},"item_1617186702042":{"attribute_name":"Language","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_1617186819068":{"attribute_name":"Identifier Registration","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15027/56183","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_1617187024783":{"attribute_name":"Page Start","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_start_page":"138"}]},"item_1617187056579":{"attribute_name":"Bibliographic Information","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2025-01-27","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3","bibliographicNumberOfPages":"20","bibliographicPageEnd":"119","bibliographicPageStart":"138","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"48","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"廣島法學","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"The Hiroshima Law Journal","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1617258105262":{"attribute_name":"Resource Type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_1617265215918":{"attribute_name":"Version Type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_1617605131499":{"attribute_name":"File","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2025-01-30"}],"displaytype":"simple","filename":"HLJ_48-3_138.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.0 MB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2035854/files/HLJ_48-3_138.pdf"},"version_id":"64ba2618-e064-45f4-a2d9-4f94c72ba689"}]},"item_1617620223087":{"attribute_name":"Heading","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_heading_banner_headline":"論説","subitem_heading_language":"ja"},{"subitem_heading_banner_headline":"Articles","subitem_heading_language":"en"}]},"item_1732771732025":{"attribute_name":"旧ID","attribute_value":"56183"},"item_title":"三者契約により銀行が有する所有権留保の買主倒産時の効力に関する2つのドイツ判例 : 求償権及び原債権並びに合意による権利構築の関係解明のために（１）","item_type_id":"40003","owner":"41","path":["1739272050430"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2025-01-30"},"publish_date":"2025-01-30","publish_status":"0","recid":"2035854","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["三者契約により銀行が有する所有権留保の買主倒産時の効力に関する2つのドイツ判例 : 求償権及び原債権並びに合意による権利構築の関係解明のために（１）"],"weko_creator_id":"41","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2025-04-22T01:46:39.163908+00:00"}