WEKO3
アイテム
ライセンスと専門職言論 : ツアーガイドの事例から
https://doi.org/10.15027/52135
https://doi.org/10.15027/5213554c734e6-3c05-4b46-bc8a-96de735d945d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-03-18 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | ライセンスと専門職言論 : ツアーガイドの事例から | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Licensing and Professional Speech: From the Cases of Tour Guides | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
井上, 嘉仁
× 井上, 嘉仁
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | ||||||||||
| 権利情報 | 許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述 | It seems popular to attack the license system using the First Amendment. In the District of Columbia and Charleston, the tour guide license system has been found to violate the First Amendment. The purpose of using the First Amendment to attack the license system is to upset the rationality review framework used in the constitutional review of occupational regulations. In other words, it is an attempt to reconstruct the examination criteria applicable to economic regulation into the framework of the First Amendment. Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. 564 U.S. 552 (2011) is providing momentum to this attempt. While the Vermont law strictly restricted pharmacies from selling records showing trends in doctors' prescriptions and banned the disclosure of such records by drug marketing companies completely, it allowed others to sell similar information. Sorrell declared this Vermont law unconstitutional. Some commentators are wary of this ruling. They consider it a move to apply strict examinations, regarding the regulation of speech on companies as a content regulation. These commentators worry that cases such as the District of Columbia, New Orleans, and Charleston may extend the First Amendment approach to economic regulation because these cases are disputing the tour guide license system as a violation of the First Amendment. As seen in this paper, no strict examination criteria were imposed on the tour guide license system. However, the intermediate examination standards, which have negligible differences from strict examination standards, are applied. Nevertheless, there are still situations that should be watched. Will the First Amendment approach to the tour guide license system succeed? This paper examines the relationship between the license system and the First Amendment from the perspective of professional speech. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 本研究はJSPS 科研費 JP19K01299 の助成を受けたものです。 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島大学法学会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/52135 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0386-5010 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN0021395X | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 148 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
廣島法學 The Hiroshima Law Journal 巻 45, 号 4, p. 148-96, 発行日 2022-03-18 |
|||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | 論説 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | Articles | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 旧ID | 52135 | |||||||||