ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 大学論集
  3. 43集

21世紀COEプログラムの評価の実態調査 : 評価委員の属性の多様性に着目して <論考>

https://doi.org/10.15027/33156
https://doi.org/10.15027/33156
b839ada2-3c44-47d8-9853-39b37c12e88d
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
DaigakuRonshu_43_223.pdf DaigakuRonshu_43_223.pdf (543.0 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 21世紀COEプログラムの評価の実態調査 : 評価委員の属性の多様性に着目して <論考>
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル An Empirical Study of the Characteristics of Evaluators Involved with the 21st Century COE Program <ARTICLES>
言語 en
作成者 西村, 君平

× 西村, 君平

ja 西村, 君平

en Nishimura, Kunpei

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
権利情報
権利情報 Copyright (c) 2012 Author(s)
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 370
内容記述
内容記述 Since the early 1990s, competitive research funds have increased and grown in significance. The 21st Century COE Program is a quintessential example of one such funds. The program was established in 2002 to cultivate a competitive academic environment among Japanese universities by giving targeted support to the creation of world-standard research and educational units (aka Centers of Excellence). By thus raising the standard of both education and research, the program seeks to elevate Japanese universities to the highest echelons, while at the same time fostering people of talent and creativity who will be able to assume world leadership roles. This paper outlines the characteristics of evaluators involved with the 21st Century Program. First, the research framework, based on previous research, is established, especially: (1) fiscal science of higher education, (2) the sociology of the academic profession (especially academic cliques), and (3) studies of the peer review system. And second, an analysis is presented of the characteristics of evaluators in relation to: (1) gender, (2) age, (3) membership of institutions, (4) academic background, and (5) job history. The main findings were: (1) the evaluators were generally older males; (2) the evaluators' committees included non-academic professionals, such as medical doctors, researchers from business institutes, and business managers; (3) some universities shared a monopoly of an evaluator's chair; and, (4) in respect to job history, many of the non-academic professors once held academic posts in universities (ex-academic professors). Finally, the findings noted above will be discussed from the view point of: (1) the mode theory of knowledge production; (2) academic clique (aka Gakubatsu) research; and (3) evaluation theory, especially for the system of peer review.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学高等教育研究開発センター
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/33156
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0302-0142
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00136225
開始ページ
開始ページ 223
書誌情報 大学論集
Daigaku ronshu: Research in higher education

号 43, p. 223-237, 発行日 2012-03
旧ID 33156
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-03-01 02:31:54.674827
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3