ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 国際協力研究誌
  3. 18巻3号

Community Participation in Decentralized Rural Development : A Case Study of Three Villages in Purbalingga District, Indonesia <Article>

https://doi.org/10.15027/32476
https://doi.org/10.15027/32476
4f6ef6d0-7d9d-4e34-940d-a9cf6aedad1b
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
JIDC_18-3_99.pdf JIDC_18-3_99.pdf (199.4 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル Community Participation in Decentralized Rural Development : A Case Study of Three Villages in Purbalingga District, Indonesia <Article>
言語 en
作成者 Sutiyo

× Sutiyo

en Sutiyo

Search repository
Maharjan, Keshav Lall

× Maharjan, Keshav Lall

en Maharjan, Keshav Lall

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 610
内容記述
内容記述 After a long time practice of centralized rural development, the government of Indonesia in 2001 applied decentralized system and transferred the authorities on planning, execution and evaluation of rural development to village government. Designed to promote community participation, the system aims to replace the state led rural development previously applied. However, after the authorities were transferred, there is a question whether the system can really facilitate community participation. This study analyzes community participation in Indonesian decentralized system by focusing on rural development planning, execution and evaluation. Case study was conducted in Serang, Kedarpan and Sumilir villages in Purbalingga District. Data were collected through interviews, informal discussions, observations and documentary studies. Data analysis shows that the inexistence of guideline on how to involve community in decision making has resulted in the differences of the type of planning meeting. While Serang and Sumilir village apply open meeting, Kedarpan village prefers to apply representation meeting. In execution, community involvement is prominent, yet the system cannot fully abolish the practice of coercive mobilization of local resources. Finally, in evaluation stage, community is not involved much to evaluate the projects and accountability practice is still weak. Overall, this study finds that village head is the main actor determining what mechanism will be conducted to involve community in rural development.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学大学院国際協力研究科
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/32476
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1341-0903
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10482914
開始ページ
開始ページ 99
書誌情報 国際協力研究誌
Journal of International Development and Cooperation

巻 18, 号 3, p. 99-110, 発行日 2012-03-31
旧ID 32476
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-02-28 10:21:39.049929
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3