ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 国際協力研究誌
  3. 6巻1号

A Hard Nut to Crack? : English passive structures for Japanese and Chinese learners of English 【Article】

https://doi.org/10.15027/14320
https://doi.org/10.15027/14320
cbea2c79-742d-4ab6-9a81-8255df04a481
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
JIDC_06_01_14_Tao.pdf JIDC_06_01_14_Tao.pdf (1.9 MB)
アイテムタイプ デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル A Hard Nut to Crack? : English passive structures for Japanese and Chinese learners of English 【Article】
言語 en
作成者 Tao, Ran

× Tao, Ran

en Tao, Ran

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 830
内容記述
内容記述 This empirical study on passive structures is done comparatively between Japanese and Chinese learn-ers of English. Though both Japanese and Chinese are said to be topic-prominent, it is still necessary tosee whether this typology exerts any different influence on the acquisition of English passive structuresby the two different native language speakers. Differences were found in the ergatives among the threelanguages. English and Chinese differ in that the former has both paired and unpaired ergatives whilethe latter has only the paired ones. Though Japanese has passive marker such as rareru like English, theergative verbs in English may not have the same counterparts in Japanese. Since there is no overt mor-phological marking for the ergatives, it should be difficult for the learners of English. A total of 160senior high school and university students from Hiroshima, Japan and Dalian, China participated in theexperiment. Based on an English proficiency test they took, the participants in Hiroshima and in Dalianare divided into 4 level groups respectively. They then took a judgement test on passive structures.Although the ANOVA test shows that there are significant differences of English proficiency among thelevel groups, the participants were not differ significantly in their judgement about passive structuresunless they were in levels that were far apart (such as level 4 vs. level 1). The study also found that boththe Japanese and the Chinese participants made fewer correct judgement on ergatives than on othertypes of passive structures. The result supported the hypothesis that passives with ergatives are more dif-ficult for both the Japanese and the Chinese learners of English.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学国際協力研究科
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/14320
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1341-0903
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10482914
開始ページ
開始ページ 211
書誌情報 国際協力研究誌
Journal of International Development and Cooperation

巻 6, 号 1, p. 211-221, 発行日 2000-03
旧ID 14320
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-02-28 09:41:46.680777
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3