ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. 欧米文化研究
  3. 8号

非自治地域から見たアメリカの人権政策 : グアム組織法を事例に

https://hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2016644
https://hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2016644
0c955fd7-d66a-4b45-8268-cc1c0b2355fa
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
OubeiBunkaKenkyu_8_57.pdf OubeiBunkaKenkyu_8_57.pdf (597.2 KB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 非自治地域から見たアメリカの人権政策 : グアム組織法を事例に
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル U. S. Human Rights Policy toward Guam as a Non-Self-Governing Territory
言語 en
作成者 池田, 佳代

× 池田, 佳代

ja 池田, 佳代

en Ikeda, Kayo

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 320
内容記述
内容記述 It has been argued that U.S. rivalry with the then Soviet Union shaped its human rights policy, especially in the late 1940's and 1950's. The U.S. tendency to manipulate human rights policies as one of their means to establish superiority over the Soviet Union is obvious in its policy regarding Guam. The U.S. designated Guam to be a Non-Self-Governing Territory within the United Nation (U.N.) system in 1946. Under the U. N. Charter, members are obliged "to develop self-government, to take due account of the political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development of their free political institutions (Art. 73-c)" and "to transmit regularly to the Secretary-General ...... statistical and other information of a technical nature relating to economic, social, and educational conditions in the territories (Art. 73-e)." As a result, the U.S. started sending information on Guam. However since annexation in 1898, the U.S. continued to hold Guam under naval administration without clarifying the status of the island and its inhabitants. After 1947, the U.S. for the first time tried to define the status of Guam by providing civil government and U.S. citizenship to the Guamanians. This coincided with the designation of the island as a Non-Self-Governing Territory, and this required the U.S. to transmit information about the island to the U.N. and to publicize every aspect of the situation. Therefore, it was imperative for the U.S. to give a favorable impression both domestically and internationally, so that it could avoid criticism on human rights violations in Guam. To this aim, the Congress passed the Interim Organic Act of Guam in 1947 and Guam Organic Act in 1950. These acts expanded Guam's congressional discretion and granted U.S. citizenship to the Guamanians. With this, the U.S. seemed to have achieved self-government and improved human rights in the region. However, when it comes to the actual contents of these acts, quite a few restrictions were imposed on the Guam congress and the Guamanians by the Federal Government. As I have mentioned, Guam Organic Act of 1950 was nothing but an excuse for the U.S. to escape domestic and international criticism on the violation of human rights. Because of this nature, the Act only made the Guamanians second class citizens and therefore, never served the purpose of developing self-government.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 広島大学大学院社会科学研究科国際社会論専攻
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10583886
開始ページ
開始ページ 57
書誌情報 欧米文化研究
Studies in European and American Culture

号 8, p. 57-71, 発行日 2001-10-01
旧ID 32271
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-02-27 09:40:58.571348
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3