ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 広島大学の刊行物
  2. HABITUS
  3. 21巻

動力学的力と力学的力 : カントの力の理論

https://doi.org/10.15027/42915
https://doi.org/10.15027/42915
49fe3cc9-7716-4e1e-a285-bc412dc0bab6
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
HABITUS_21_27.pdf HABITUS_21_27.pdf (1.2 MB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ_(フル)(1)
公開日 2023-03-18
タイトル
タイトル 動力学的力と力学的力 : カントの力の理論
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Dynamical and Mechanical Force: Kant's Theory of Physical Force
言語 en
作成者 嶋崎, 太一

× 嶋崎, 太一

ja 嶋崎, 太一

en Shimazaki, Taichi

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
主題
主題Scheme NDC
主題 130
内容記述
内容記述 Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (1786) consists of four chapters: Phoronomy, Dynamics, Mechanics, and Phenomenology. Force, the key concept of his theory of physics, is discussed in Dynamics and Mechanics. The distinction between dynamical and mechanical force is one of the crucial points of Kant's physics in the critical period. He argues that all mechanical laws presuppose dynamical laws because the former treat a moving force as matter moving through dynamical force. In this paper, I examine the historical background and the source of these distinctions. In contemporary physics, mechanics is the science of the moving body in general, and includes dynamics and statics. However, in Kant's period, the position of these disciplines in physics was not clear. Kant's Essay on Living Forces refers to both dynamics and mechanics, but this terminology is influenced by Wolff, who used both terms without clear classification. Given this situation in the pre-critical period, Kant's system, which claims that dynamics is superior to mechanics, is not consistent with his young age. He had noted two methods of physics, that is, dynamical and mechanical methods, in his lectures of metaphysics since the 1770s. The mechanical method, that is atomistic "Corpuscular philosophy", is represented by Epicurus and Descartes, while the dynamical approach is founded by Newton, and assumes the immanent force. In the 1780s, Kant argued that mechanical methods presupposed hypothetical absolute density and absolute empty. The model for the mechanical method is the theory of the confliction of perfectly elastic bodies. However, he accepted, even during his pre-critical periods, that a gravitational "action in distance" is unable to be explained by the model of confliction. Hence, it is necessary for his physics to assume the original immanent force. Thus, he must distinguish the mechanical force (F=mv) from the dynamical original force.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 西日本応用倫理学研究会
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.15027/42915
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 2186-7909
開始ページ
開始ページ 27
書誌情報 HABITUS
HABITUS

巻 21, p. 27-42, 発行日 2017-03-23
見出し
大見出し 研究論文
言語 ja
旧ID 42915
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-02-27 03:21:24.198189
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3