WEKO3
アイテム
ヘルマン・コーヘンの理想論
https://doi.org/10.15027/39832
https://doi.org/10.15027/39832118f40f2-c4a6-4dbd-b7f8-dfce4d916dad
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
HABITUS_20_1.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-03-18 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | ヘルマン・コーヘンの理想論 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | On the Ideal in Hermann Cohen's Ethics | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
松井, 富美男
× 松井, 富美男
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||||||
| 主題 | 130 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This essay aims to clarify Hermann Cohen's view of the ideal in the context of Judaism. Kant secured the independence of the ethical sphere by a discrimination of 'ought' from 'is', but did not pay full attention to the realization of morality. Therefore Kant's ethics have been criticized for being unrealistic. Cohen insists that Kant should pursue the being of the 'ought-to-be' in accordance with 'a method of purity'. It is 'pure will' that is to be produced from the originative principle. Pure will can also be a realization of morality produced in relation only to time. However this reality is in principle very different from natural objects of thought, for it is characterized as a concrete individual idea, that is, the ideal. The ideal, which is said to have originated from Plato, is indispensable to pure ethics. Cohen discovers the moral reality of 'the ideal of eternity'. Needless to say, the word 'eternity' was also used in Kant's philosophy, for example, 'eternal peace'. According to Cohen, however, it originated from Judaism. In this way, he tries to reinterpret various concepts of Kant's ethics in the context of Jewish culture. In Western philosophy, Cohen is often considered as an epigone of modern rationalists such as Kant, Fichte, and Hegel. This valuation is not entirely inappropriate, but seems to neglect another dimension of Cohen's thought. We should now pain a fuller picture of Cohen as both a Kantian and a Jewish philosopher. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 西日本応用倫理学研究会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/39832 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2186-7909 | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 1 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
HABITUS HABITUS 巻 20, p. 1-16, 発行日 2016-03-18 |
|||||||||
| 見出し | ||||||||||
| 大見出し | 研究論文 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 旧ID | 39832 | |||||||||
