WEKO3
アイテム
シュタイナー教育思想の哲学的基盤(3) : フィヒテの自我論の受容と克服 <研究論文>
https://doi.org/10.15027/39030
https://doi.org/10.15027/39030af629ee4-3b7b-4751-93b7-4e0566408a3a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
HABITUS_19_35.pdf (817.1 KB)
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ_（フル）(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-03-18 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | シュタイナー教育思想の哲学的基盤(3) : フィヒテの自我論の受容と克服 <研究論文> | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | The Philosophical Ground of Steiner’s Educational Thought (3) : The Reception and Overcoming of Fichte' s Theory of the “I" | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
衛藤, 吉則
× 衛藤, 吉則
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||||||
| 主題 | 130 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this paper is to clarify the philosophical ground of Rudolf Steiner’s educational thought, focusing on his understanding of Fichte’s theory of the “I." First, the construction of the theory of the “I" in Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre (The Science of Knowledge) is generalized on the basis of Steiner’s interpretation. In Fichte's theory, it is thought that reason as “absolute knowledge" is not divided dualistically and that recognition is able to transform with the “I" monistically. In light of this, Steiner expects the possibility of an epistemology that involves the movability of consciousness. Steiner focuses on Fichte’s two methods for finding the pure concept of the “I"and observing our own selves, discovering in them the significance of the “introspective approach." Next, Steiner’s criticisms of the epistemological range and passivity of Fichte’s theoretical “I" are described. Steiner criticizes Fichte’s theory for its division between theoretical “I" and practical “I," and for the spring from unconstraint to constraint. Thus, Fichte’s theory is rejected by Steiner on the basis that it requires us to accept a divine categorical imperative from outside, like Kant’s. Steiner insists that such an intellectual intuition is not a part of any true epistemology. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 西日本応用倫理学研究会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15027/39030 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2186-7909 | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 35 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
HABITUS HABITUS 巻 19, p. 35-49, 発行日 2015-03-20 |
|||||||||
| 旧ID | 39030 | |||||||||
